Tuesday, January 8, 2008

‘NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE’ Bill [UK House of Lords] – setting out the context of the Objections - Part 2

Objections to the CrossRail Bill, as being made available to the UK
House of Lords, starting today

By©Muhammad Haque
1250 Hrs GMT
Tuesday
8 January 2008


The Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crossrail hole
plot [now – since 22 February 2005 - known as the
’CrossRail Bill’ in the UK Parliament] has as an
active and dynamic entity consisting of a number of
campaigning persons, manifestly adopted and followed
an expressly constructed and transparent set of
ethical and accountability and evidential principles,
codes and criteria including the elements that even
when we are `opposed’ in the context of our campaign
to the conduct of the council as a corporate entity we
have given and are giving to the council and to the
known holders of the relevant positions in that
council due notice and due opportunities to respond to
questions, answer allegations, comments, inquiries as
based on or as arising from or as related to their
[the decision-making holders of positions in the name
of and within the lbth council] relevant conduct,
agenda and intentions.

The same has been the standard of the Khoodeelaar!
conduct in relation to the role, the behaviour of
the successive holders in the post of the ‘Secretary
of State for Transport’.


Just as it has been in relation to the local ‘MP’, the
local ‘GLA’ member, the ‘mayor of London.’ Transport
for London and the CLRL Company.

We have extended to the office of the Speaker of the
House of Commons due opportunity in relation to the
complaints that we have had cause to make as based on
the behaviour of the bureaucracy and the personnel
responsible for obstructing our access to the Palace
of Westminster as well as about the abuse of office by
the bureaucracy that controlled the ‘Crossrai Bill
select committee’ in the House of Commons during in
particular the year 2006.

Khoodeelaar! will put to the House of Lords
representative and adequate copies of the
constitutional law-based representation of our
opposition as put to the above in the course of the
past four years [so far] of our campaign.